From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Nov 14 11:40:39 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 865)
	id DBD0937B4C5; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 11:40:37 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 11:40:37 -0800
From: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Cc: asami@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Afterstep port
Message-ID: <20001114114037.A46808@hub.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Hello!

Is there any sense to keep x11-wm/afterstep port?
It represents an old 1.0 version, while the latest stable version is 1.8.4
(afterstep-stable port).

If there will be no objections, I propose to remove x11-wm/afterstep
and to repo-copy afterstep-stable -> afterstep.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message