Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 19:08:39 +1000 From: MJ <mafsys1234@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ruby 2.4.7,1 considered vulnerable? Message-ID: <8fc5cb9c-8860-8067-9ae9-e96981fe497d@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.21.99999.352.1908311013180.5686@enterprise.ximalas.info> References: <alpine.BSF.2.21.99999.352.1908310904001.5686@enterprise.ximalas.info> <531cf12d-0038-ec72-f173-033d7b2d44ba@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.21.99999.352.1908311013180.5686@enterprise.ximalas.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 31/08/2019 6:14 pm, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 17:43+1000, MJ wrote: > >> Given the liberal use of portepoch in the package versions I expect >> the maintainer has got confused. Indeed perhaps it's the portepoch >> that's causing the issue. Perhaps contact the maintainer to get it >> worked through? > > I just created PR 240227: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240227 > Good stuff. I just looked at the Ruby website. The way the version numbers jump around in Ruby, I'm not surprised about this. Regards Mark
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8fc5cb9c-8860-8067-9ae9-e96981fe497d>