Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Sep 2016 07:27:40 -0400
From:      Ian Jefferson <ijeff@sandbox.ca>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: freebsd-update not updating kernel?
Message-ID:  <E13BA61B-1299-4C3D-BC48-826A835B9A2C@sandbox.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20160922120159.362abd1963b2baee4b148ebd@sohara.org>
References:  <CAAiTEH-DC8riFyroP-kMuptXut5-CJLk9M52vd9kH9FJ_y=8GQ@mail.gmail.com> <0B507E9E-77ED-4CD9-A51D-EF1B35DA45CD@sandbox.ca> <20160922120159.362abd1963b2baee4b148ebd@sohara.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


> On Sep 22, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 06:14:28 -0400
> Ian Jefferson <ijeff@sandbox.ca> wrote:
>=20
>> I was having a similar issue with freebsd-update not being aware =
(able?)
>> to patch up to 9.3-RELEASE-p45.
>=20
> 	Not all updates change the kernel so it is very possible for the
> kernel version (which uname reports) to be older than the latest =
update
> installed. In 10.3 there's freebsd-version which reports the system =
version
> as distinct from the kernel version to resolve this problem, I'm not =
sure
> if it has been backported to 9.3 though - try it and see.
>=20

Thanks,

It doesn=E2=80=99t seem like freebsd-version is backported to 9.3 but =
I=E2=80=99m not sure that would fix the freebsd-update problem nor the =
lsof issue either.

I also found this:

"The updates distributed by freebsd-update do not always involve the =
kernel. It is not necessary to rebuild a custom kernel if the kernel =
sources have not been modified by freebsd-update install. However, =
freebsd-update will always update/usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh. The =
current patch level, as indicated by the -p number reported by uname -r, =
is obtained from this file. Rebuilding a custom kernel, even if nothing =
else changed, allows uname to accurately report the current patch level =
of the system. This is particularly helpful when maintaining multiple =
systems, as it allows for a quick assessment of the updates installed in =
each one. =E2=80=9C

here:  =
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrad=
ing-freebsdupdate.html

Indeed it looks to me like /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh on my system =
=E2=80=9Cknows=E2=80=9D that I am at patch level 45 but freebsd-update =
doesn=E2=80=99t nor does uname.  I think you are saying that uname =
get=E2=80=99s its information from the kernel but that is contradicted =
by the handbook points above so I=E2=80=99m unclear and regardless =
freebsd-update seems broken in this patch.

My newvers.sh file contains the following:

TYPE=3D"FreeBSD"
REVISION=3D"9.3"
BRANCH=3D"RELEASE-p45"
if [ "X${BRANCH_OVERRIDE}" !=3D "X" ]; then
        BRANCH=3D${BRANCH_OVERRIDE}
fi
RELEASE=3D"${REVISION}-${BRANCH}"
VERSION=3D"${TYPE} ${RELEASE}=E2=80=9D

I suppose the ultimate answer is we need to move off 9.3 since it is =
just about EOL anyway but I wonder=E2=80=A6 if freebsd-update is =
confused will it perform the upgrade correctly?

Ian







Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E13BA61B-1299-4C3D-BC48-826A835B9A2C>