From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Dec 20 18:47:37 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA04043
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 18:47:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA04038
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 18:47:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id SAA05794; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 18:47:33 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id SAA00152; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 18:47:39 -0800
Message-Id: <199512210247.SAA00152@corbin.Root.COM>
To: patricio@pandora.uc.pt ( Patricio Domingues)
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: multi-processors... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 Dec 95 19:28:42 +0100."
             <9512201828.AA07217@pandora.uc.pt.uc.pt> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 18:47:34 -0800
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>A "bug"  ocurred in my previous mail...
>where it is written:
>
>...and support for multi-processing
>
>it should be 
>
>... and support for multi-processors.

   You were right the first time. "Multi-Processing" aka MP and more
specifically, SMP (Symetric Multi-Processing) is definately planned for
FreeBSD's future and your help in this area would be most welcome.
   What Ugen confused was "Multi-Tasking", which of course we do indeed
already have.

-DG