From owner-freebsd-bugs  Thu Oct  5  2:57:30 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id D8E0437B502; Thu,  5 Oct 2000 02:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from turing.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa71134@salmon>; 5 Oct 2000 10:57:21 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:57:20 +0100
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: dwmalone@FreeBSD.org
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, bob@immure.com
Subject: Re: misc/21204: bit_ffc and bit_ffs macros in bitstring.h test 1 byte too many.
Message-ID: <20001005105720.A1562@turing.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <200010022119.OAA17662@freefall.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.2i
In-Reply-To: <200010022119.OAA17662@freefall.freebsd.org>; from dwmalone@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 02:19:13PM -0700
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 02:19:13PM -0700, dwmalone@FreeBSD.org wrote:

> I've looked at the patch and it seems correct. Anyone want to review it for
> me?

As bde pointed out, the patch is not correct. Bitstring.h also has
other problems. If no one objects I'll sync our version with NetBSD's
version. They have already fixed most of the issues with the code.

	David.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message