From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 25 08:13:20 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66317CC04BA; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A4FEA7A; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cWIhi-0007Q7-74; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 09:13:18 +0100 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 09:13:18 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Bernd Walter Subject: Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports? Message-ID: <20170125081318.GT13006@home.opsec.eu> References: <20170125042413.GK85666@cicely7.cicely.de> <20170125062045.GS13006@home.opsec.eu> <20170125075459.GL85666@cicely7.cicely.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170125075459.GL85666@cicely7.cicely.de> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:13:20 -0000 Hi! > > 11.0-RC1 was superseded by 11.0-REL, so while that message is a bit > > drastic, there's a point to it. > > With that argument only the latest version would be supported. https://www.freebsd.org/releases/ lists the supported releases. There are no release candidates listed. > That said, it is a release candidate and as such one could argue that > there never had been any official support at all. > In that case however the message is wrong, because when a support has > ended it implies that there was support. > > The check in the code is this one: > .if (${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && (${OSVERSION} < 1003000 || (${OSVERSION} >= 1100000 && ${OSVERSION} < 1100122))) || \ > (${OPSYS} == DragonFly && ${DFLYVERSION} < 400400) > > It is not about RC as such, it is explicitly about 11.0-RC. > My OSVERSION is 1100121. > So obviously support starts with the first release. > Fair enough, but then the message is still wrong unless it was supported. What's stopping you from upgrading to -REL ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go !