From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Sun Dec  6 19:55:33 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FFA77C2
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun,  6 Dec 2015 19:55:33 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from schultz@ime.usp.br)
Received: from iris.ime.usp.br (iris.ime.usp.br [143.107.45.5])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A086C102A
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun,  6 Dec 2015 19:55:33 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from schultz@ime.usp.br)
Received: from hpmini (unknown [187.65.219.230])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 (Authenticated sender: schultz@iris.ime.usp.br)
 by iris.ime.usp.br (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40D60290037F;
 Sun,  6 Dec 2015 17:55:29 -0200 (BRST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ime.usp.br; s=mail;
 t=1449431732; bh=NoUBP9NG0qzs3yw9U+AdoYG+DJQx9jECViszPHlk7Ig=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=jsS5RDWJdjXWy4bk/hxSL8KwRoKBdcuSpnD3f4Xw+fqeBAk1NAfbgQJFuDhvR9MNa
 pvYQhp2tqre07gXliuPDc9bR+It9sQXlGU6OcwNCN3tq8v9uswp67ogV7CqrugXytw
 5lJTf54o4oL5ZEr32v3qKjwDWNJY4SzVGWtMCJdQ=
Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 17:57:09 -0200
From: =?utf-8?B?THXDrXM=?= Fernando Schultz Xavier da Silveira
 <schultz@ime.usp.br>
To: Anton Sayetsky <vsasjason@gmail.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: OSS in jail
Message-ID: <20151206195709.GA4100@hpmini>
References: <20151206194401.GA3860@hpmini>
 <CAA2O=b_isQOHepigMgDyDGtOidpbYkLOmvEayCbETfLEbUsDKA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151206194851.GA4044@hpmini>
 <CAA2O=b_o=Jfmg=ny6JDvgeznR_HVpBr+BO0anPFDfsUBp_RBKQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAA2O=b_o=Jfmg=ny6JDvgeznR_HVpBr+BO0anPFDfsUBp_RBKQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on iris.ime.usp.br
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 19:55:34 -0000

> Pleas, reply to list instead of users.

Sorry.

> If a user has write access, how do you want to prevent him to set permissions?

This is the precise problem.
I need either a stronger form of access control than unix permissions
or two separate devices for playback and recording.
Or maybe a separate OSS stack, in the spirit of VIMAGE.
These options seem unrealistic, but the use case does not seem
unreasonable, which is why I pose the question.