From owner-freebsd-isdn Fri Oct 26 9:46:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A077037B443 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:46:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9QGfjM03510; Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:41:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Andrew Gordon Cc: freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RFC1974 (STAC) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Oct 2001 15:30:53 BST." <20011026145515.X37247-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:41:45 +0200 Message-ID: <3508.1004114505@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <20011026145515.X37247-100000@server.arg.sj.co.uk>, Andrew Gordon wr ites: >It's rather a narrow loophole though! Well, a loophole is a loophole... >> >It is also not clear that it offers much advantage in typical use, since >> >.... >> >> STAC makes a good dent in the tcp headers and stuff... > >Even after they've been VJ-compressed? VJ compression is very loss-sensitive and therefore not desirable. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message