From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Dec 20 21:08:34 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA11752
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 21:08:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blob.best.net (blob.best.net [204.156.128.88])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA11743
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 21:08:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from geli.clusternet (rcarter.vip.best.com [204.156.137.2]) by blob.best.net (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id VAA26278; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 21:08:28 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by geli.clusternet (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA02938; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 21:07:27 -0800
Message-Id: <199512210507.VAA02938@geli.clusternet>
X-Authentication-Warning: geli.clusternet: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.4 10/10/95
To: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net>
cc: "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@geli.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: BSD networking code guru needed? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 Dec 1995 18:51:02 MST."
             <199512210151.SAA01526@rocky.sri.MT.net> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 21:07:27 -0800
From: "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@geli.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

} > So THAT is what is going on...  I've got the (possibly) same problem with
} > 16 dual homed systems on two subnets when running a distributed computation
} > on most to all of the interfaces.  Only started when I upgraded these
} > systems to the 2.1-STABLE 3 weeks ago.  Just started trying to
} > track this thing this week.
} 
} The easiest way to check this is to do an 'arp -a' on the machine that
} is confused.
} 
} 
} Nate
} 

Here's a cc to hackers of what I previously sent to Nate, I'm not
currently subscribed, guess I have to, but it may be of interest...

rcarter@daisy-1601:~ [42] arp -a
dancer.ca.sandia.gov (146.246.246.1) at 8:0:69:4:a:10
alfalfa.ca.sandia.gov (146.246.246.10) at 8:0:69:7:5d:fc
daisy-1600.ca.sandia.gov (146.246.246.32) at 0:20:af:38:53:2e
fdaisy-1600.ca.sandia.gov (146.246.246.105) at 0:0:c0:ca:d9:c5
? (146.246.246.127) at (incomplete)
con246.ca.sandia.gov (146.246.246.254) at 0:0:c:4:38:55
? (146.246.246.255) at (incomplete)
rcarter@daisy-1601:~ [43] 


The fdaisy-1600 entry is causing a lot of problems.

Russell