From owner-freebsd-current Mon Nov 2 18:04:55 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA19020 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 18:04:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from garman.dyn.ml.org (pm106-19.dialip.mich.net [192.195.231.221]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA18996 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 18:04:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garman@garman.dyn.ml.org) Message-Id: <199811030204.SAA18996@hub.freebsd.org> Received: (qmail 25587 invoked from smtpd); 3 Nov 1998 02:05:40 -0000 Received: from localhost.garman.net (HELO garman.dyn.ml.org) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.garman.net with SMTP; 3 Nov 1998 02:05:40 -0000 Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 21:05:39 -0500 (EST) From: garman@earthling.net Reply-To: garman@earthling.net Subject: Re: still problems with inetd & malloc... To: jmz@FreeBSD.ORG cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199811021354.OAA09972@qix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2 Nov, Jean-Marc Zucconi wrote: > There is a fix (it works for me). Look for > Subject: Re: bin/8183: Signal handlers in inetd.c are unsafe > in the archives. > thanks for the pointer. it's working so far... so now the $64,000 question is: why hasn't this been committed? enjoy -- Jason Garman http://garman.dyn.ml.org/ Student, University of Maryland garman@earthling.net And now... for the stupid-patent-of-the-week: Whois: JAG145 "...an attache case with destruct means for destroying the contents therein in response to a signal" -- patent no. US3643609, filed in 1969 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message