From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Sep 25 13:03:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA09798 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 13:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from counterintelligence.ml.org (mdean.vip.best.com [206.86.94.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA09771 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 1997 13:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jamil@localhost) by counterintelligence.ml.org (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA01235; Wed, 24 Sep 1997 23:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 23:28:36 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jamil J. Weatherbee" To: nobody cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ee taking up weird cpu amount. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id NAA09777 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jed is better, however the port has a flaw in that it does not correctly handle PageUp/PageDn, If that was fixed I wouldn't use anything else. On Thu, 25 Sep 1997, nobody wrote: > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND > root 18863 99.1 1.2 388 732 p3- R 6:59PM 673:39.41 ee > /etc/pw.018862 > > I've had this happen several times now, where I would login to my system > and see ee taking up 99% CPU (on a P2/266). As you can see, this is some > guy doing chfn I guess. This process has been on for 12 hours now though. > > Any known problems with ee? (besides the fact that Im about to rename it > and put joe in its place). > > This is on a 2.2-STABLE system. (last CVSup'd about a week ago). > > > --- > thomas strömberg . system admin, royal institute of technology (stockholm) > nobody@darkening.com . irc:nobody@EFnet . talk:nonxstnt@silent.darkening.com > real coders don't use comments. It was hard to write; it should be hard to read > > >