Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 02 Jun 2003 08:17:03 -0700
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
To:        Hiten Pandya <hmp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        des@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: VFS: C99 sparse format for struct vfsops
Message-ID:  <3EDB6A6F.827B7C22@mindspring.com>
References:  <20030602014757.GA99626@perrin.int.nxad.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hiten Pandya wrote:
> My fingers have been itching to do this since the day phk@ planted this
> idea in my brain (re: cdevsw initialisations).  Basically, it changes
> the vfsops to use C99 sparse format, just like cdevsw.  It removes a lot
> of junk default initialisations, and duplication.

I really dislike the changes to vfs_init().  Specifically, it's
not the overhead, so much as it's the implied side effects.

Consider this going forward: someone adds a new VFSOP to the
list of allowable VFSOPs, and the vfs_init() doesn't have any
specific code for it.

This could happen with a new VFS implementation that gets loaded
as a module.  While the current code can't really handle this
well, the changes move us further away from ever being able to
handle something like this.  8-(.

-- Terry



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EDB6A6F.827B7C22>