From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 17 3:25:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net (falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF8B37B404; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 03:25:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from pool0014.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.14] helo=mindspring.com) by falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16RAg0-0004iF-00; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 03:25:48 -0800 Message-ID: <3C46B45A.27C8AB4D@mindspring.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 03:24:10 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Somers Cc: Sheldon Hearn , arch@freebsd.org, brian@freebsd.org Subject: Re: termcap versus terminfo References: <200201171116.g0HBGCL32118@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brian Somers wrote: > I think it might be better to have a job like this that just checks > the db source times against the db times and complains when the > sources are newer. > > If people are actually updating the sources without running the > relevant _mkdb program, then maybe that needs to be addressed (more > loudly) rather than fixing the problem ? I was actually thinking that if the db was not newer than the termcap, it should just have the application complain, and do the search the old, slow way. In fact, I'm not sure that it doesn't. 8-). Someone might want to look, and while they are there, add it, if it's not there already... -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message