From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 16:45:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4492106564A for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbw@sbw.org) Received: from fallback1.registeredsite.com (fallback1.registeredsite.com [209.237.135.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552D18FC0A for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail46.atl.registeredsite.com (mail46.atl.registeredsite.com [209.237.134.236]) by fallback1.registeredsite.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o5OFwEem004198 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:58:14 -0400 Received: from sbw.org (sbw.org [216.122.248.82] (may be forged)) by mail46.atl.registeredsite.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o5OG85sd027408 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:08:05 -0400 Received: from sbw630.sbw.org (sbw.org [216.122.248.82]) by sbw.org (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id o5OG85G80090 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:08:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sbw@sbw.org) Message-Id: <201006241608.o5OG85G80090@sbw.org> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:07:55 -0700 To: apache@freebsd.org From: Steve Williams Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: mod_wsgi port for Apache 2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 16:45:55 -0000 I'm curious why there are a mod_wsgi ports for Apache 1.3, but not for Apache 2. I was able to install mod_wsgi from source without difficulty. But I'd prefer to use a port. So I'd like to know if there's a reason a port for Apache 2 is not needed. My interest was prompted by this announcement: http://docs.webfaction.com/software/django/mod-migration.html Thanks!