From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 4 15:10:02 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B6A16A418 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 15:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D934313C455 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 15:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id lB4FA2Ue014965 for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 15:10:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id lB4FA2HC014960; Tue, 4 Dec 2007 15:10:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 15:10:02 GMT Message-Id: <200712041510.lB4FA2HC014960@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Romain =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tarti=E8re?= Cc: Subject: Re: ports/118397: New Port: ports-mgmt/pkg_search - A nifty script searching the ports database X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Romain =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tarti=E8re?= List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:10:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/118397; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Romain =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tarti=E8re?= To: Matthias Schmidt Cc: Romain =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tarti=E8re?= , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/118397: New Port: ports-mgmt/pkg_search - A nifty script searching the ports database Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:04:35 +0100 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 03:01:27PM +0100, Matthias Schmidt wrote : > This is a known bug and fixed in Version 1.1 (-> website). Once =20 > pkg_search is added as a port, I'm planning to bumb PORTVERSION. Or =20 > should I submit a patch with the new PORTVERSION right now? IMHO, avoiding =AB early adopters =BB to get disapointed by a new port that do not work as expected on their system is always a good point ;-) Kind regards, Romain --=20 Romain Tarti=E8re http://romain.blogreen.org/ pgp: 8DAB A124 0DA4 7024 F82A E748 D8E9 A33F FF56 FF43 (ID: 0xFF56FF43) (plain text =3Dnon-HTML=3D PGP/GPG encrypted/signed e-mail much appreciated) --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHVWyD2OmjP/9W/0MRAnchAKCBhW8k9uAMZIlHZa+Xe04zWrQZ0gCeNXfR 9NdQcAklN6Ch2bvABVK0Cso= =dQBB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--