Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 02:27:29 -0500 From: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> To: "Tim J. Robbins" <tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au> Cc: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pwd -L option Message-ID: <20020204022729.D6496@espresso.q9media.com> In-Reply-To: <20020204110944.A20748@descent.robbins.dropbear.id.au>; from tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au on Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 11:09:44AM %2B1100 References: <20020130181638.A8510@descent.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20020202032917.K10222@espresso.q9media.com> <20020202210237.A2326@descent.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20020203174511.A6496@espresso.q9media.com> <20020204110944.A20748@descent.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tim J. Robbins <tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au> writes: > > This isn't quite right yet. realpath(1) should never call getopt(). > > It expects no options, so `realpath -L' should return a valid path > > ending with `/-L'. > > Conceptually pwd and realpath have something in common, but their > implementations don't. I don't agree with having realpath built in to > pwd. There's probably not much I can do about that, though. Agreed; realpath(1) should be broken out into its own source file. I'll add it to my TODO list. > Here's another attempt at a patch. Committed (with a few minor modifications), thanks! Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020204022729.D6496>