Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 00:45:52 +0200 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r270099 - in stable: 10/contrib/gcc/config/i386 9/contrib/gcc/config/i386 Message-ID: <9181921C-43BB-48C9-B63D-7C6F99D7A763@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140817134509.GA47327@FreeBSD.org> References: <201408171308.s7HD8Fnh099147@svn.freebsd.org> <20140817131942.GA38672@FreeBSD.org> <8CA269F6-BCD2-4E78-947F-682214367F36@FreeBSD.org> <20140817134509.GA47327@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail=_C83297FD-146A-46B2-9B6B-8A9FE967E121 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 17 Aug 2014, at 15:45, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 03:29:42PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> In principle it is applicable, but the same file also has other changes >> in head which were not MFCd, so just MFCing this one commit does not >> make much sense. For example, the earlier cast fixes were part of a >> much larger commit by Pedro Giffuni, adding "experimental support for >> amdfam10/barcelona CPUs": >> >> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=251212 > > I'm running my stable/8 with Pedro's patches applied, including r251212, > no problems so far (although I don't have recent AMD CPUs to play with). > >> Does it still make sense to backport such experimental changes to an old >> stable branch? Of course I could split off just the changes to >> emmintrin.h, and leave the others out, but then we would have a partial >> MFC. I'm not sure if that is the usual way of doing things... > > Understood. My goal here is to try to keep stable/8 as alive as possible, > since I plan to keep using it beyond its official EOL. Hence, when I see > fixes that potentially help ports to be buildable on it I'd usually ask if > they can be MFCed (when it's easy enough to do). Can you please try this diff [1], which merges most of the stable/9 gcc changes to stable/8? I've ran it through a make universe, and the only failure I got was with the amd64 XENHVM kernel: amd64 XENHVM kernel failed, check _.amd64.XENHVM for deatils but I don't know if this is an expected failure or not. Tinderbox seems to have other trouble with its stable/8 builds. The actual error is: In file included from sys/sys/param.h:86, from sys/compat/ia32/ia32_genassym.c:6: sys/sys/types.h:44:28: error: machine/endian.h: No such file or directory I didn't test any ports yet, though. -Dimitry [1] http://www.andric.com/freebsd/sync-stable8-gcc-with-stable9-1.diff.xz --Apple-Mail=_C83297FD-146A-46B2-9B6B-8A9FE967E121 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAlPxMMUACgkQsF6jCi4glqOzTgCfSWlos/pA4l9XzksU4X659yf4 IPYAoMlpUIvUERHn5T2JgSwV3872cXKO =uqz+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_C83297FD-146A-46B2-9B6B-8A9FE967E121--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9181921C-43BB-48C9-B63D-7C6F99D7A763>