Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 3 Jun 2000 18:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc:        James Howard <howardjp@wam.umd.edu>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Assembly programming under FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <200006040154.SAA60426@apollo.backplane.com>
References:  <200006031520.LAA06255@rac4.wam.umd.edu> <20000603101851.U17973@fw.wintelcom.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:> interface, does this simplfy Linux emulation?  Hinder it?
:> 
:> Also, this is more general, what does "CALL 7:0" do?
:> 
:> Sorry for the silly question, I got curious.
:
:I could be totally off base, but I'm pretty sure (from memory) that
:the lcall interface is the ICBS interface (some standard for x86
:unix binaries), the int 80 interface is supposedly quicker on more
:recent CPUs so it's now the default.
:
:I'm pretty certain that FreeBSD will still honor any program that
:uses the lcall interface.
:
:-- 
:-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]

    Yes, your right.  int 80 is considerably faster then lcall which is why
    we moved to it.  FreeBSD will definitely honor any program
    using the old interface.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006040154.SAA60426>