Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 09:45:17 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 156226] [lagg]: failover does not announce the failover to switch Message-ID: <bug-156226-2472-XDrea9s410@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-156226-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-156226-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156226 --- Comment #15 from eugen@grosbein.net --- (In reply to pvz from comment #14) > the hypothetical but plausible scenario That's competly real scenario. My FreeBSD-based PPPoE BRAS'es run hundreds of VLANs over lagg port-channels and each VLAN carries PPPoE frames only, no IP traffic at all. Of course, I use LACP for failover (and load balancing too). And LACP does not send its signalling traffic over each vlan (and should not). Why don't people want to use already invented layer-2 signalling protocols but try to invent a wheel every time? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-156226-2472-XDrea9s410>