From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 9 20:36:03 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7A516A412 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [80.253.10.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EF213C459 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:36:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from srv.sem.ipt.ru ([192.168.12.1] helo=ipt.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H4NBy-0007Az-US; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:03:31 +0300 Received: from bsam by ipt.ru with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1H4NE0-000B0M-M5; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:05:36 +0300 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <20070108165157.GA94941@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <57417212@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20070108180014.GA4540@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20070108210813.368389dc@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20070109204604.62915dc7@Magellan.Leidinger.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 23:05:36 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20070109204604.62915dc7@Magellan.Leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:46:04 +0100") Message-ID: <89565167@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Divacky Roman , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken linuxulator in -current as of Jan 8 17:51:45 CET X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 20:36:03 -0000 On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 20:46:04 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Anyone out there who is willing to play with the order > in /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf to see if it helps (don't forget to run > ldconfig in a chroot). Do you mean to find a warkaround for the particular case (running linux ls)? It may work. But generally seems to me not a good idea, 'cause libraries are searched from a newer version -> to old ones. The case is that the needed old obsoleted linux library has the same version as the FreeBSD new one. Though I don't have a better/another proposal. :-( WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve