Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:26:12 -0600 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Kees Jan Koster <kjkoster@gmail.com> Cc: Gary Gatten <Ggatten@waddell.com>, Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Diagnosing packet loss Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK13KLHg6PPztVaxaS=P3g6rsTKyv8482V2K00=iURLUNw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <763864D4-CC19-4473-AFAF-D22EF94E08A2@gmail.com> References: <2973_1321996526_4ECC10EE_2973_123_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499D2C69D77@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <4B28ADC5-8325-442E-8F02-9AE3535D8C6D@gmail.com> <CAHu1Y70JMTDfCE6awUvxqq6YWStNcLt8S-HB-5N%2Bo3ggTHQFpw@mail.gmail.com> <763864D4-CC19-4473-AFAF-D22EF94E08A2@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Kees Jan Koster <kjkoster@gmail.com> wrote: > [kjkoster@saffron ~]$ ifconfig bge0 > bge0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 > > options=8009b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,LINKSTATE> > ether 00:e0:81:32:ed:b4 > inet 91.196.169.165 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 91.196.169.167 > inet 91.196.169.166 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 91.196.169.166 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX > <full-duplex,flowcontrol,rxpause,txpause>) > status: active > [kjkoster@saffron ~]$ fgrep bge0 /etc/rc.conf > ifconfig_bge0="inet 91.196.169.165 netmask 255.255.255.248" > ifconfig_bge0_alias0="91.196.169.166 netmask 255.255.255.255" > > That broadcast address and netmask look wrong for sure. > > Should I just change that to 255.255.255.248 as well? > No, that is correct. Leave your alias alone if you want it to continue to work. -- Adam Vande More
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK13KLHg6PPztVaxaS=P3g6rsTKyv8482V2K00=iURLUNw>