Date: 11 Jan 1999 17:38:31 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@futuresouth.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rwhod patch Message-ID: <xzp90f9u5mg.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav's message of "11 Jan 1999 17:36:15 %2B0100" References: <199901040159.TAA23631@mortis.futuresouth.com> <199901040200.SAA29570@freefall.freebsd.org> <19990110220932.B24234@futuresouth.com> <xzpaezpu5q8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> writes: > "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@futuresouth.com> writes: > > It's a fairly trivial and noncontroversial change (I'd think; though the > > status quo on widespread issues would seem to refuse that there IS such a > > thing as a noncontroversial change). What are the chances of getting > > this reviewed and possibly committed before the Day-O-Branching? > Quite high now that I've seen this :) Ah, Steve Price beat me to it. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp90f9u5mg.fsf>