Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Apr 1998 10:23:40 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        Harlan Stenn <Harlan.Stenn@pfcs.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: bin/6353 
Message-ID:  <199804221423.KAA01392@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <2459.893228576@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <12590.893227546@brown.pfcs.com> <2459.893228576@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 22 Apr 1998 09:02:56 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> said:

> The alternative is to kill amd and make am-utils a port instead

> I think I prefer the alternative, what do the good people on -current say ?

Strongly disagree.  Every NFS system out there comes with an
automounter of some sort or another.  Most of them come with Sun's
broken automount(8), for which the source is thankfully unavailable.
amd is an important, fundamental part of an NFS implementation (and
one which we may need to hack at times in order to reflect changes in
our kernel code).

-GAWollman

--
Garrett A. Wollman   | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same
wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | O Siem / The fires of freedom 
Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame
MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA|                     - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804221423.KAA01392>