From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Jul 5 17:53:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4BD37BD1B for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 17:53:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA18310; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 18:53:00 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20000705185057.04988a30@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 18:52:57 -0600 To: Narvi , Dann Lunsford From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: ((FreeBSD : Linux) :: (OS/2 : Windows)) Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <20000701124530.A36442@greycat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 04:34 AM 7/5/2000, Narvi wrote: >The only two things that ultimately helps keep people making programs that >are for freebsd are: > a) the ability to do so easily > b) the willingness of people to buy the freebsd version of these > programs Not quite true. If developers perceive that the "easiest" way is just to develop for Linux and let FreeBSD users run the software under emulation, then (a) results in the software NOT being ported. And because there is one less version to support, the vendor doesn't have to worry about (b). So, once emulation in place, the business case for focusing on Linux becomes compelling for many vendors. Sad, but true. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message