From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Mar 7 0:40:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ruhr.de (in-ruhr4.ruhr.de [212.23.134.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D17737B417 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 00:40:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 5320 invoked by uid 10); 7 Mar 2002 08:40:01 -0000 Received: (from ue@localhost) by nathan.ruhr.de (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g278bP698183 for doc@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 09:37:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ue) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 09:37:25 +0100 From: Udo Erdelhoff To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Porter's handbook changes for review Message-ID: <20020307093725.E88805@nathan.ruhr.de> Mail-Followup-To: doc@FreeBSD.org References: <200203070315.g273FYN20881@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200203070315.g273FYN20881@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 07:15:34PM -0800, fenner@FreeBSD.org wrote: > so could someone make sure these changes > are vaguely reasonable? except for the usual whitespace trouble, the patch applies cleanly and it compiles... uh, survives the make, that is. The table looks good in lynx, as well. I just noticed one thing: 3.5-RELEASE was followed by 3.5.1-RELEASE after a few days because of some nasty bug in the Kerberos code. According to the cvs log, __FreeBSD_version was not bumped for this, but I think you should list 3.5.1 in the table. /s/Udo -- Schnell und schluepfrig wie geoeltes Ferkel auf Crack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message