Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 16:16:37 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Andrew Boothman <andrew@sour.cream.org> Cc: "FreeBSD-Stable" <FreeBSD-Stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: CTM Release Generation - (Re: Stable and CTM) Message-ID: <199810261416.QAA27648@gratis.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of " Mon, 26 Oct 1998 13:03:53 GMT." <3.0.5.32.19981026130353.007b7e90@ice.cream.org> References: <Your message of " Sun, 25 Oct 1998 17:20:00 GMT." <3.0.5.32.19981025172000.007cf500@ice.cream.org> <Your message of " Sat, 24 Oct 1998 22:54:50 %2B0100." <3.0.5.32.19981024225450.007af190@ice.cream.org> <3.0.5.32.19981024225450.007af190@ice.cream.org> <3.0.5.32.19981025172000.007cf500@ice.cream.org> <3.0.5.32.19981026130353.007b7e90@ice.cream.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Boothman wrote: > As the handbook states, there is no documentation on the creation of CTM > deltas so could you enlighten me as to why multiple source trees are > needed? Surely it is more or less a diff between the code as frozen on the > release date, and the code as it stands today? Yes. 1 copy for "release code", one copy for "current code". Multiply that by N for our different releases, the CVS tree and the ports collection, and things add up a tad. > Failing that, which machine currently produces CTM deltas, and would be > charged with creating the release deltas? Could this operation be moved to > a machine with more space available? If that is an offer for the machine, then yes, thank you. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org PS if your bot mails me again to tell me about the newspaper balls-up, I may just go postal. There are better solutions; please check out vacation(1). m To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810261416.QAA27648>