From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Oct 30 02:04:05 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA13031
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Fri, 30 Oct 1998 02:04:05 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from jkoshy@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA12988;
          Fri, 30 Oct 1998 02:03:52 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkoshy)
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 1998 02:03:52 -0800 (PST)
From: Joseph Koshy <jkoshy>
Message-Id: <199810301003.CAA12988@hub.freebsd.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Andrew Maltsev <am@amsoft.ru>
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports/8492 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 30 Oct 1998 11:21:16 +0300."
             <199810300821.LAA27540@amsoft.ru> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org



> Thank you!!

Thanks for taking the effort to make a port.

> Why into libexec/ruboard instead of just libexec?
> What is the idea behind it?

(a) to reduce the chance of a filename collision and
(b) to improve administrative convenience as all the ports files are
    kept in one sub-directory.

The other ports (emacs, gnats, nmh etc) do it that way.

Regards,
Koshy





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message