From owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Sun Jun 12 14:55:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CADAF1FBA for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 14:55:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [185.24.122.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FFAC2736 for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 14:55:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from crayon2.yoonka.com (crayon2.yoonka.com [192.168.1.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u5CEtqxQ035303 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2016 14:55:52 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Subject: Re: qjail or qjail2? References: <6d708ff4-de99-bfc5-f2d7-2568fa368256@gjunka.com> <20160612130722.GC41922@home.opsec.eu> To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: <3fe16418-124d-d591-043e-9aad854e7df8@gjunka.com> Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 14:55:52 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160612130722.GC41922@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 14:55:54 -0000 On 12/06/2016 13:07, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> Which qjail should I use, qjail 4.7 or qjail2 2.2? Does the qjail >> project have any documentation apart from http://qjail.sourceforge.net/? > qjail, as qjail2 is a non-longer updated version of qjail, as > far as I understand. > Both have some recent changes in their respective SVN branches: https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/qjail https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/qjail2 And both don't seem to have received too many updates recently.