From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 29 17:53:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA09436 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 17:53:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from thor.dee.uc.pt (tmp.dee.uc.pt [193.136.205.35]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA09413 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 17:53:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from nt.dee.uc.pt (nt.dee.uc.pt [193.136.205.37]) by thor.dee.uc.pt (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id BAA03836; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 01:53:10 GMT Message-ID: <32F00CCB.3D47@dee.uc.pt> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 02:51:55 +0000 From: Paulo Menezes X-Sender: Paulo Menezes (Unverified) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b1 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Robey , Paulo Menezes , Paulo Menezes , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: Upgrade of Mesa X-Priority: Normal References: <32F00483.5860@dee.uc.pt> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------32D8C8D720" Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk ------------32D8C8D720 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Chuck Robey wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Jan 1997, Paulo Menezes wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Chuck Robey wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Paulo Menezes wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you include some more information as to how the Mesa authors are > > > identifying this release? > > > > This is release 2.1 and the shared libs are created by default with 2.1 > > numbers. > > In the previous ports these number were changed to 12.0, 13.0 etc.. > > Why can't you just use 2.1? What's wrong with that? You could look for > and destroy any older version 12.0, 13,0, etc in the Makefile. > Sure I can create an INSTALL script to do this. I'll try to create a "safe install" with lots of boring questions :) By the way, why the test of the "already installed" is not performed before installing the files. It sounds strange that the error message appears after having finished the installation, when it tries to register it. Paulo > ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- > Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data > chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. > 9120 Edmonston Ct #302 | > Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run Journey2 and picnic, both FreeBSD > (301) 220-2114 | version 3.0 current -- and great FUN! > ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- ------------32D8C8D720 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> On Thu, 30 Jan 1997, Paulo Menezes wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Chuck Robey wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 29 Jan 1997, Paulo Menezes wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Could you include some more information as to how the Mesa authors are
> > > identifying this release?
> >
> > This is release 2.1 and the shared libs are created by default with 2.1
> > numbers.
> > In the previous ports these number were changed to 12.0, 13.0 etc..
>
> Why can't you just use 2.1? What's wrong with that? You could look for
> and destroy any older version 12.0, 13,0, etc in the Makefile.
>

Sure I can create an INSTALL script to do this.

I'll try to create a "safe install" with lots of boring questions :)

By the way, why the test of the "already installed" is not performed before installing the files.

It sounds strange that the error message appears after having finished the installation, when it tries to register it.

Paulo

> ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
> Chuck Robey                 | Interests include any kind of voice or data
> chuckr@eng.umd.edu          | communications topic, C programming, and Unix.
> 9120 Edmonston Ct #302      |
> Greenbelt, MD 20770         | I run Journey2 and picnic, both FreeBSD
> (301) 220-2114              | version 3.0 current -- and great FUN!
> ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------

------------32D8C8D720--