From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 16 02:10:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 002E1997 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 02:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F56233F for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 02:10:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s9G2ARW4034716 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:10:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s9G2ARkB034713; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:10:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:10:27 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: William Bulley Subject: Re: exiting Xorg locks up 9.2-STABLE system In-Reply-To: <20141016005027.GE1350@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> Message-ID: References: <20141016005027.GE1350@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 15 Oct 2014 20:10:28 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 02:10:36 -0000 On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, William Bulley wrote: > According to Warren Block on Wed, 10/15/14 at 18:44: >> >> No, you're right. It appears that 9-STABLE only supports either sc or vt, >> but not both. > > Okay, so if I'm unwilling to jump to 10.x at this point (having just > upgraded to 9.3-STABLE from 9.2-STABLE), what's a fellow to do about > this apparent failure mode (when exiting an Xorg session) on 9.3-STABLE? > > Do I try to use the vt(4) device (which seems to have failed me this > morning) or stick with sc(4) (where things seem to hang when exiting > my Xorg sessions)? Appears to be a bit of a Catch-22 to my thinking... :-( The path of least resistance is to add vt to the GENERIC kernel config that comes with 9.3 and try to build that. The thought is that your custom kernel config may be missing things that vt needs.