From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 23 12:35:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3979564C; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f45.google.com (mail-bk0-f45.google.com [209.85.214.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8004F8FC18; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:35:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id jk13so2997120bkc.4 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 04:35:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=85lGcjuONd9sHhbhlwcxZOQ+z4ncPJd5rLYh4gWo2TE=; b=0VR9wTHBd2q9pRGkEvvgcQXEUsuoSwRDHIiZ/7ZlxCsUs/DT8vrIMQ+jbqZrSU/Y1U xvMVcDRI3Asmm3neSOGfXstpD873IYUMwjkbGV25R41RoBUu0HjywvHWVFbGdIHLXrA5 JFK9zssekUzgUpEaRJISb0D4i8FB/NLYTSbIOrzg0RSQGFWBaNU8OgYnxkjl0iGVvWn/ gQC1elK9SWO1g683yYm/ZOsn+kO/IFCKgFziZ4t1f4a+lOizKJ6JUNHE+A08gd6luNG1 aS6bHxeQZ0nJS8/lsgkh+0LewRkB9ov+ArS7oeyF7h8M0teGYJ9+ZBB5hbdJXkEhR2St TMQg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.150.137 with SMTP id y9mr8996290bkv.103.1356266111211; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 04:35:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.167.71 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 04:35:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.167.71 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Dec 2012 04:35:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1356218834151-5771583.post@n5.nabble.com> <50D644E5.9070801@martenvijn.nl> Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:35:11 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 9.1 minimal ram requirements From: Chris Rees To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Marten Vijn , Sergey Kandaurov , FreeBSD , jakub_lach@mailplus.pl X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 12:35:13 -0000 On 23 Dec 2012 06:40, "Adrian Chadd" wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Would someone please file a PR for this? This is a huge unused > allocation of memory for something that honestly likely shouldn't have > been included by default in GENERIC. > > I've cc'ed ken on a reply to this. Hopefully after the holidays he can > chime in and figure out what's going on. > > Maybe just disabling it in GENERIC moving forward is enough - chances > are it'll be fine being just a module. Oh gods... Please let's just make it an erratum notice at this stage! Chris