From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 20 17:06:49 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456A616A418 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:06:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [IPv6:2001:1b20:1:3::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F44A13C467 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:06:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lBKH6fPu067682; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:06:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id lBKH6fwn067680; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:06:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from olli) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:06:41 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200712201706.lBKH6fwn067680@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, maxx@mobistarmail.be, jcoombs@gwi.net In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.3-20070201 ("Scotasay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/6.2-STABLE-20070808 (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:06:47 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7 on old SMP server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, maxx@mobistarmail.be, jcoombs@gwi.net List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:06:49 -0000 Joshua Coombs wrote: > MaXX wrote: > > I have an old netfinity 7000 (Quad PIII 500, 1Gb RAM) running 6.2 > > at the moment. I was wondering if it will take benefit of all the > > SMP improvement of 7 or is it too old? It runs a few postgresql > > databases, peak loads in the 2 to 4 range. It's not too old, and I would recommend that you give 7.0 a try. Don't forget to enable the ULE scheduler. I've got a dual Celeron-466 with 448 MB RAM, and it's certainly not too old, either. (OK, Celerons aren't the best processor to build an SMP system, but it does work nicely for me. And it was dead cheap for an SMP system at the time when I built it, about 10 years ago.) > My hacked up 386 showed gains going from 6.2 to 7, the big win that I've > noticed is scp throughput, I can sustain 40 to 45kbps where in the past > the box walled at around 30kbps. Apache seems to have less latency > responding to gets also. I'm just running a 7b3 kernel at the moment, > I'm going to have to repartition with a lot more swap space to be able > to build a 7 world (When did the ram use for a buildworld skyrocket?!) > but even with this setup, 7 + ULE is a win for me. Are you saying you run FreeBSD 7 on an 80386(SX/DX) machine? How exactly did you hack it? As far as I know, support for 80386 processors was removed from FreeBSD a while ago. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'