From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 10 13:54:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26CE106566B for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:54:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@smeets.im) Received: from mail.solomo.de (mail.solomo.de [IPv6:2a01:238:42c7:9a00::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1148FC0A for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.solomo.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.solomo.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CD35C26; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:54:49 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vistream.de Received: from mail.solomo.de ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.solomo.de (mail.solomo.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 33CUJslgyyOV; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:54:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from nibbler.vistream.local (relay3.vistream.de [87.139.10.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.solomo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C62095C1E; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:54:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4CDAA427.7050306@smeets.im> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:54:47 +0100 From: Florian Smeets User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zeus@ibs.dn.ua References: <20101110133730.GC16153@relay.ibs.dn.ua> <20101110134448.GA78809@relay.ibs.dn.ua> In-Reply-To: <20101110134448.GA78809@relay.ibs.dn.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: load average numbers (update) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:54:50 -0000 On 10.11.10 14:44, Zeus V Panchenko wrote: > some update ... > Hi, > /100 > root idle XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > root idle XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > root idle XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > root flowcleane XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > quagga bgpd X > > > so, the question now: how to know why flowcleane consumes so much? > there have been multiple reports that flowtable and bgp don't work together very well. Try disabling it: # sysctl net.inet.flowtable.enable=0 -- Florian Smeets