From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jun 10 9:29:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.spvi.com (h194.spvi.com [208.150.70.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BD637BBF9 for ; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 09:29:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@mercury.spvi.com) Received: (from steve@localhost) by mercury.spvi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA12773; Sat, 10 Jun 2000 11:26:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from steve) Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 11:26:40 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200006101626.LAA12773@mercury.spvi.com> From: Steve Spicklemire To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: steve@spvi.com Subject: natd performance/fuction OK in 4.0? Reply-To: steve@spvi.com Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Folks, I'm having wierd problems with Natd. I set up a 4.0 stable box here at my place, and another at a client's. (I'd been running 2.2.8 here for over a year.. with great performance so I'm pretty sure the setup ought to work). Now when I upgrade to 4.0 here I get crummy general network performance on the hosts that are masked. Actually, I should be more clear, I get poor performace when they go through *natd*. Also.. I had the oddest thing happen at the client's. When I turned on the firewall rules (with a IPDIVERT/IPFIREWALL kernel) the unmasked interface could ping, but not telnet, to the router. I've never seen anything like that before. I'd love to get this sorted out. Is there anything I can do to debug what's going on? Do you have any suggestions? Things I could look for with tcpdump? (Almost) Any comments would be helpful... thanks, -steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message