From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 29 04:52:15 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933BC16A41F;
	Thu, 29 Dec 2005 04:52:15 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C3843D5A;
	Thu, 29 Dec 2005 04:52:15 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (root@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jBT4qDN8069912;
	Thu, 29 Dec 2005 04:52:14 GMT (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <43B36B83.7080404@freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 12:52:19 +0800
From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050928
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jason Evans <jasone@freebsd.org>
References: <E1E22E2D-A6D5-49CC-9649-C37C50F0443B@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <E1E22E2D-A6D5-49CC-9649-C37C50F0443B@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: New malloc ready, take 42
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 04:52:15 -0000

Jason Evans wrote:

> So, how about it?  Is jemalloc ready to go in now?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason

I have tested super-smack with your patch on my Pentium-D machine:
CPU   : P4 dual-core 2.8Ghz
Memory: 1G bytes
I am using libthr.

phkmalloc can reach about 21000 query-per-s.
jemalloc can only reach about 15000 query-per-s,
about 28% performance is dropped.


David Xu