From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Oct 27 06:46:54 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id GAA23420 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 06:46:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports) Received: from fps.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id GAA23403 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 06:46:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co) Received: from localhost by fps.biblos.unal.edu.co (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03) id AA45290; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 09:39:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 09:39:43 -0500 (EST) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3.0-packages seem to be out of date. In-Reply-To: <7943.877912663@time.cdrom.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk You mean like....ports are supported for current? I thought these were considered broken by Tcl-8.0 and therefore were not updated. Did Satoshi's Tcl patch do a miracle? Pedro. On Sun, 26 Oct 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > If you install, say, bash along with any recent 3.0-SNAP installation > you'll find that it doesn't run, needing libtermcap.so.2.1 among other > things. Where were these packages built? I think they need a > rebuild, to be sure, and we should also look forward to a flood of > complaints (and the need to come up with a suitable workaround) from > the 3.0-971006-SNAP CDROM users since the problem is also in the > packages directory on that CD. :-( > > Oh well. > > Jordan >