From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 28 09:10:04 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69F548BB
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:10:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 041D81CD6
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:10:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.143] ([95.91.231.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003)
 with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lkx9B-1VMffl21ll-00apd3 for
 <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:09:56 +0100
Message-ID: <52BE9563.2050007@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 10:09:55 +0100
From: Lokadamus <lokadamus@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Subject: Re: Probs with FreeBSD 10- Beta/ RC and Xorg
References: <52BDC486.1060901@gmx.de> <20131228061414.2bc6aef3@X220.alogt.com>
 <52BE044F.6090800@gmx.de> <20131228015037.bff71cc4.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <20131228015037.bff71cc4.freebsd@edvax.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:HYtLNv6o8qj6icFUaM0iRKTYJUh24gtDzji2BfIJQhI81lS+NWy
 XxG1UdVPubCQwwAj1NiLET6PtVu9+jC/sHoRKncRfuhvdcrbIu1pvbAqssu3T3L34J7FtND
 xwD2J+rl7ihjUvPMufvJndkXF/h1FC/bGKm9Sp22CRQrHD7iCNxaYULzUsOvgasVjzgT0LW
 CE6tbmssd88HHnp0oApig==
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:10:04 -0000

Am 28.12.2013 01:50, schrieb Polytropon:
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 23:50:55 +0100, Lokadamus wrote:
>> Compile xorg from ports needs 2 days to compile on my old P4- 3GHz. This
>> is not an Option. :(
> Excuse my question - is this _for real_? I've been using a P4 2 GHz
> for many years and didn't have such high compile times. Yes, sure,
> compiling stuff like X.org or OpenOffice may take some hours, even
> the OS needs few hours, and a kernel half an hour, but TWO DAYS
> really sounds too high...
Yes, i use portmaster to get all dependencys and when i start in the 
morning and
do something on it (using Firefox + NoScript + Adblock eats much cpu 
time), 2 days
will become real.

Compiling Firefox with portmaster needs round about 4 hours.

Firefox under FreeBSD 10 working good, i get the same speed as under 
Windows XP.
Under FreeBSD 9 it needs more time to load a website.

At work i have an old dualcore from AMD and it needs for xorg 4 or 8 
hours and firefox
in 2 hours.

I doesn't tune my settings because i get later errors, when i updatet 
it. And recompiling doesn't make
fun, when i must wait 1 or more hours to see wether it is working now.