From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 4 17:30: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2799015130 for ; Tue, 4 May 1999 17:30:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id RAA65224; Tue, 4 May 1999 17:30:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 17:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199905050030.RAA65224@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Thomas D. Dean" Subject: Re: ports/11465: The port chipmunk will not run. Reply-To: "Thomas D. Dean" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/11465; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Thomas D. Dean" To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, tomdean@ix.netcom.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/11465: The port chipmunk will not run. Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 17:24:49 -0700 The distribution from Berkeley works fine. The only changes I made were to the Makefiles and to one *.h file to include the definitions for select(), fd_set. The Makefile changes were to add the FreeBSD CFLAGS and to select the correct X things, either libs or includes. I notice there are many changes in the patches. Since the original distribution works on a nominal FreeBSD installation, Why are there so many patches? tomdean To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message