From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 31 19:52:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D6E16A4CE for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 19:52:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235C743D1F for ; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 19:52:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) iBVJrGuq050574; Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:53:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@FreeBSD.org) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Alexander Leidinger In-Reply-To: <20041231140557.1956ddd7@Magellan.Leidinger.net> References: <20041230195320.GA91304@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041230203049.GA11245@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041230211112.GA20159@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041230215331.GA29414@xor.obsecurity.org> <1104447677.8767.3.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20041231004046.715eaea2@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <1104451192.23882.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20041231140557.1956ddd7@Magellan.Leidinger.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-nVITzXcvzQeDiFok6NZO" Organization: FreeBSD, Inc. Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:52:19 -0500 Message-Id: <1104522739.14416.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: x11@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: linux vs freebsd fc-cache binaries X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 19:52:38 -0000 --=-nVITzXcvzQeDiFok6NZO Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 14:05 +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 18:59:52 -0500 > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >=20 > > On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 00:40 +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 18:01:17 -0500 > > > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > >=20 > > > > 2.1.9 would work, but we have not updated due to the API changes. > > > > Therefore, I haven't tested 2.1.9 to know if its rendering style wi= ll be > > > > uglier than 2.1.7. If someone can produce a 2.1.9 RPM, and it rend= ers > > > > decent fonts, then by all means, go for it. > > >=20 > > > Will the data produced by fc-cache be compatible? The linux bits will > > > use the FreeBSD fonts, so any files generated in a place which FreeBS= D > > > sees too has to be compatible. > >=20 > > The data produced by the two should be compatible, but the versions of > > fontconfig are so different, I can't say for sure. The files, however, > > are text, so you should be able to visually compare >=20 > Here's the difference between our fc-cache and the linux one. Our > fc-cache produces some more hints, but I hope this doesn't confuse the > linux bits. I intend to _not_ run the linux version of fc-cache and let > the FreeBSD version handle the fonts. The hinting shouldn't matter. Freetype should just ignore what it doesn't understand. Joe --=20 Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome --=-nVITzXcvzQeDiFok6NZO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBB1a3yb2iPiv4Uz4cRAmt4AJ96kbjh/jB3gwTtkm7RwqgWwsoETQCggx1Q gdETPPvVJqGI2QnjhOyhKYk= =DWzw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-nVITzXcvzQeDiFok6NZO--