From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 28 12:20:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2115416A4E0 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:20:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4500C43D72 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:20:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7SCKWZm081899 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:20:32 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k7SCKWuX081898; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:20:32 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:20:32 GMT Message-Id: <200608281220.k7SCKWuX081898@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org From: Gleb Smirnoff Cc: Subject: Re: bin/102422: ipfw & kernel problems where firewall rules aren't interpreted correctly X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gleb Smirnoff List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:20:35 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/102422; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gleb Smirnoff To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" Cc: "Stephen E. Halpin" , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, Oleg Bulyzhin , Luigi Rizzo Subject: Re: bin/102422: ipfw & kernel problems where firewall rules aren't interpreted correctly Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:15:30 +0400 On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 02:26:36PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: A> Stephen E. Halpin wrote: A> >processing, and it worked fine. I still have a question about PR 91245, A> >as when I went to the following page: A> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/ipfw/ A> > A> >and it looks like the last version of ipfw2.c is 1.96 on the MAIN A> >branch, and the changes in PR 91245 are not there. It would be awesome A> >if all three fixes could make it into the 6.2 release! A> A> This PR was closed by rev. 1.88 in CURRENT, and rev. 1.76.2.10 in A> RELENG_6, and will be in 6.2-RELEASE. But i don't know about this PR. A> Gleb, Oleg - any comments? :) I wonder why Max Laier, who has handled the isn't in cc? -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE