Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:04:39 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206665] ports-mgmt/pkg : 1.6.3 building for RPI2 (arm) gets: passing 'size_t *' (aka 'unsigned int *') to type 'off_t *' (aka 'long long *') Message-ID: <bug-206665-32340-S1tmQ1aIAp@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-206665-32340@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-206665-32340@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206665 --- Comment #2 from Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #1) This was the very first time that I've built pkg as a port on the RPI2B (ar= m). The unsigned int* vs. long long* warning did not stop the build but look problematical to me. My powerpc64 (PowerMac) and amd64 history would be less likely to generate = such a warning and if they did I did not notice historically. A powerpc (32-bit PowerMac) might get the warnings but I've not done any po= rt building activity there for a very long time. It would add big endian to the mix (RPI2B arms being set up for little endian). Big endian long long (64 b= it) getting a big endian long int (32 bit) for the same address is more likely = to be problematical: the 32 bits ends up as the most significant part of the = 64 bits. Sorry if the extractions from the log were too long for a description. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-206665-32340-S1tmQ1aIAp>