From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 6 02:47:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8E616A41C for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 02:47:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cykyc@yahoo.com) Received: from web50302.mail.yahoo.com (web50302.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D931043D46 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 02:47:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cykyc@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 20376 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Jul 2005 02:47:14 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=w9UDS3rT/Ikh24oB5bFVzYZTf+T8CVrz9GeuTTk3sOzWxFBhoDBbVr5a/cPZQ8qwpycztByJXkgQbNN6wclFwybuXl9btCzwio+lKDYFehGWL1MsKkB3iw/zV4kEW5M03GobdIpqQ0/tEe3viC8XJNvfOJHqFsnHpsZIowm6XRI= ; Message-ID: <20050706024714.20374.qmail@web50302.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.98.54.121] by web50302.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 19:47:13 PDT Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 19:47:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Jon Passki To: udo.schweigert@siemens.com, ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Fwd: Re: Tenable Commerical Registered Plugin Feed Licensing Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: cykyc@yahoo.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 02:47:15 -0000 Hello, In the forwarded email below (from the Nessus general list), Renaud of Tenable Security verified my comment that any individual/company using any plugins other than the GNU plugins _and_ scanning systems not owned by themselves may be in a breach of contract. If they get the core or plugin source code from any other server other than a Nessus/Tenable server, they might be violating the EULA. Should this be marked RESTRICTED, MASTER_SITES be altered to only go for nessus.org/tenablesecurity.com servers, or the project not even worry about it? HTH, Jon --- Renaud Deraison wrote: > CC: nessus-gen > From: Renaud Deraison > Subject: Re: Tenable Commerical Registered Plugin Feed Licensing > Question > Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 21:51:20 -0400 > To: cykyc@yahoo.com > > > On Jun 30, 2005, at 11:23, Jon Passki wrote: > > > Hey All, > > > > Could someone clarify these two points in the license agreement > > [1], since I think they may have farther reaching affects than > > anticipated (or perhaps not): > > > > "Registration. You agree to use the Plugins only in conjunction > > with Nessus or NeWT vulnerability scanner programs obtained > > directly from www.nessus.org or www.tenablesecurity.com and > > registered with Tenable (“Registered Scanners”)." > > > > Am I out of the terms if I receive the scanning code from the > > FreeBSD project's ftp server or a Gentoo mirror versus the > > aforementioned URL's, since the code was not received directly > from > > those URL's? To me, "directly" means getting it right from > those > > URL's. Also, what about caching proxy servers and such? > > Yes. You have to install Nessus directly from www.nessus.org. > > > > -- Renaud ____________________________________________________ Sell on Yahoo! Auctions – no fees. Bid on great items. http://auctions.yahoo.com/