From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 12 12:26:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456D41065689; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:26:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from constantine.ticketswitch.com (constantine.ticketswitch.com [IPv6:2002:57e0:1d4e:1::3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE5B8FC18; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from dilbert.rattatosk ([10.64.50.6] helo=dilbert.ticketswitch.com) by constantine.ticketswitch.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KSswq-000Hwe-DD; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:26:00 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ticketswitch.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1KSswq-000AcK-Bz; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:26:00 +0100 To: mat@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <6338C16505B9465ED4A9CA76@andromede.in.absolight.net> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:26:00 +0100 Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: neighbor discovery problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 12:26:02 -0000 > The network is pretty simple, > > gateway : > em0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=b > inet6 fe80::207:e9ff:fe0e:dead%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet6 2a01:678:1:443:: prefixlen 64 > inet6 2a01:678:100:: prefixlen 48 Hmmm, are machine numbers of all zeroes legal in IPv6 ? I would configure those as '2a01:678:1:443::1' and '2a01:678:100::1' if I were you. All zeroes as a machine number is certainly a no-no in IPv4, and I wouldn't use it in IPv6 either. I have no idea if it's actually a problem, but it gives me a bad feeling.... -pete.