From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 12 20:34:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477A416A41F for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:34:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mv.twc.weather.com (mv.twc.weather.com [65.212.71.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19AD43D55 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:34:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [10.50.40.201] (Not Verified[65.202.103.25]) by mv.twc.weather.com with NetIQ MailMarshal (v6, 0, 3, 8) id ; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:48:37 -0400 From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 16:27:43 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <4.3.2.7.2.20050712134818.0202b0d0@mail.qconline.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20050712150444.01fb8078@mail.qconline.com> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20050712150444.01fb8078@mail.qconline.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200507121627.44317.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Harry Coin , Nate Lawson Subject: Re: mss.c pcm fix to ' attach returned 6 ' load failure for v5.x acpi and up X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:34:33 -0000 On Tuesday 12 July 2005 04:12 pm, Harry Coin wrote: > John, > > I am sincerely appreciative the time you have taken. Your test results > are below. > > I haven't processed everything you've written, but I'm not going to hold > you up waiting as that is going to take a while. > > The code just comments out the line you mentioned. pcm0 loads with ACPI on > in this case. I haven't tested what happens with ACPI off, and have no > easy way to test what will happen with the other non-pnp chips (or other > pnp chips) this driver supports. Ok, thanks. > I suggest you send a copy of your comments to whoever fixes up the > architecture manual, because of evident disagreement regarding best > practice in the isa non-pnp driver detection method (ISA_PNP_PROBE vs. > isa_get_logical_id). Well, I think I've just figured out why it says that (the ACPIxxxx devices), so it looks like I am going to have to go through and fix all the various drivers to use a probe routine if they attach to ACPI. It looks like several drivers attach to acpi that probably don't need to as well (ACPI only enumerates built-in hardware like COM ports, etc. It doesn't enumerate ISA PnP cards). -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org