From owner-freebsd-net  Mon Mar 22 11:19:56 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from poboxer.pobox.com (unknown [208.149.16.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AE1A214D68; Mon, 22 Mar 1999 11:19:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from alk@poboxer.pobox.com)
Received: (from alk@localhost)
	by poboxer.pobox.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA02536;
	Mon, 22 Mar 1999 13:19:42 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from alk)
From: Anthony Kimball <alk@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 13:19:42 -0600 (CST)
X-Face: \h9Jg:Cuivl4S*UP-)gO.6O=T]]@ncM*tn4zG);)lk#4|lqEx=*talx?.<li^!8ecK]}3L-
	6`ZQW3}kxy*5]B<KA"&iBl58"/$W-0PP`B7c%'XczR)8T0VN47L`rQlu8qBIX4TJ|v'D%:k7GO%v4A
	Os>Gk,dMQU2)ptPC17cpBzm(l'M|H8BUF1&]dDCxZ.c~Wy6-j,^V1E(NtX$FpkkdnJixsJHE95JlhO
	5\M3jh'YiO7KPCn0~W`Ro44_TB@&JuuqRqgPL'0/{):7rU-%.*@/>q?1&Ed
Reply-To: alk@pobox.com
To: gpalmer@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: clustering/load balancing 
References: <14070.29383.300007.474845@avalon.east>
	<62642.922130015@gjp.erols.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs  Lucid
Message-ID: <14070.38645.340702.523783@avalon.east>
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Quoth Gary Palmer on Mon, 22 March:
: > 
: > You don't need physically redundant nic in order to have multiple
: > load balancers:  The servers don't care whether packets are routed to
: > them through nic 1 or nic 2.  
: 
: But how do you route back out? Running gated is one answer I guess...
: Not one I'd readily choose.

I'm less squeamish.  But even so, it's
a non-issue for connection-oriented protocols.
If they just serve web or nfs over tcp, no worries.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message