From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 14 14:55:07 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4659116A419 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3A913C461 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:55:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IsJdo-0003jj-TZ for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:54:56 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:54:56 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:54:56 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:58:09 +0100 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <86y7d1nk8t.fsf@zid.claresco.hr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) In-Reply-To: <86y7d1nk8t.fsf@zid.claresco.hr> Sender: news Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.3 or FreeBSD 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:55:07 -0000 Marko Lerota wrote: > I see that 6.3 and 7.0 is comming. Now I'm using 6.2-RELEASE for > my servers. To what should I upgrade? Which of them will be stable > or production release? For low-loaded machines, 7.0 is stable enough even with all the new goodies like ZFS, tmpfs, ULE - I have such a machine with almost 30 days uptime and have done 24h+ stress testing on another machine before blessing it for production - but I still wouldn't trust it for mission critical "heads will roll" type of servers. If you can, try it on a spare or lightly loaded server, it's worth it.