From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jun 11 16:29:09 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA07154 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 16:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA07147 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 16:29:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Root.COM (8.7.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id QAA02686; Tue, 11 Jun 1996 16:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199606112329.QAA02686@Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.Root.COM: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: Scott Banachowski cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Intel EtherExpress support? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 11 Jun 1996 14:10:35 -0000." <31BD7E5B.3957C1A9@unix.sri.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Tue, 11 Jun 1996 16:29:12 -0700 Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >I haven't had any luck getting freebsd to recognize an Intel >EtherExpress PRO/100 PCI card at /dev/ix0 (the supposed driver for this >card). It does find the card when probing the PCI bus, but prints a >message along with it that says: no driver loaded. >Is the PCI version of this card not supported, >or am I doing something wrong? The ix driver is NOT for the Pro/100 card. We currently don't have a driver for the Pro/100 (based on the 82556 chip). I wrote a driver for the Pro/100B (based on the 82557 chip), however, and it's available in 2.1-stable and -current source trees. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project