From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 4 12:48:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB6C16A583 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2007 12:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A6513C441 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2007 12:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so1048597uge for ; Sun, 04 Feb 2007 04:48:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=B4SDtrYNrCAGnDvort6O2MzWYc3aJrSmGggeVho8M2MZmmfbstTfU39DTXQXwtMnBtH/7skkoJRmlrnGAS45SDQlGFQ2EyoWBlFLD0UqMiynVbznq637WBinn9WfciyM6CCBPKhCbrnohf0QEGGGy9zI911SymBoMs+7gyCdmnw= Received: by 10.78.204.20 with SMTP id b20mr985635hug.1170593288451; Sun, 04 Feb 2007 04:48:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.170.11 with HTTP; Sun, 4 Feb 2007 04:48:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 15:48:08 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" Sender: infofarmer@gmail.com To: "Gerald Pfeifer" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: a95b5aa2e5bdd2be Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LIB_DEPENDS not really required for build? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:48:15 -0000 On 2/4/07, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Sun, 4 Feb 2007, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > You should take another look at the excerpt you > > posted. Looks like portsdir has been redefined. > > Yes, PORTSDIR has been redefined to point to where my ports reside. ;-) > > I fully understand that I am missing these dependencies. They simply do > not exist on that system. > > My complaint is that the build should stop immediately, with a clear error > message, instead of forging ahead and silently do the wrong thing or fail > at a later stage, during build, installation, or run-time. It's been written in big red letters that partial/broken ports trees are not supported.