From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 7 14:12:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDB01065670 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 14:12:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED978FC12 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 14:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so7041385bkc.13 for ; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 06:12:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.154.2 with SMTP id m2mr927673bkw.110.1331129535905; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 06:12:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id jc4sm38884535bkc.7.2012.03.07.06.12.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 07 Mar 2012 06:12:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F576CBE.5040607@my.gd> Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 15:12:14 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: krad References: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F4C8A61.5010605@my.gd> <4F55A834.5050302@comcast.net> <4F55DDBA.9010301@my.gd> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkkiml9LFSzBIBUVIcHq5lO6TIqZBvp6sPTGqIg4OZVFJHCVHTgZygfYxQmP3P+X77ydHU5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 14:12:18 -0000 On 3/6/12 12:30 PM, krad wrote: > > apart from a major bump in the version of pf. Still the old syntax though, what I'm eager for is 10.0 with the upgrade to 4.8 openbsd PF.