From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jun 28 21:22: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.email.msn.com (cpimssmtpu08.email.msn.com [207.46.181.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4396737BAF9 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:21:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kmays@email.msn.com) Received: from KenMays - 63.30.241.184 by email.msn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:21:31 -0700 Message-ID: <00ad01bfe180$8ca74860$b8f11e3f@KenMays> From: "kmays" To: References: <20000628125500.A49568@phy.hr> Subject: Use 4.0-STABLE or 5.0-CURRENT? Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:14:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I started talking about the new way to tell about versioning and remember how current is noted by the "5.0-yyyymmdd-CURRENT". Question #1: Should be use v4.0-STABLE for production and 5.0-20000625-CURRENT for new development/testing?? Question#2: What is the latest 4.0-yyyymmdd-STABLE version as of today and where is it usually located?!? Is there a place to get the ISO image or can a request to make a weekly or monthly version of it possible?!? I only saw 4.0-20000307-CURRENT I think this is where people are getting confused (if not somewhere else). I'm thinking to just use 5.0-CURRENT since it makes sense for bug tracking and new development. Otherwise, if its not broke then don't mess with it or use FreeBSD v4.0-RELEASE. Period! Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message